Definition

The In Between

User Constructed/ing (I)

Determining Ends (I)

Shiny Interfaces (II)

Globalised Localities (II)

Fragmentation

Tactile Exercises

Universal, One Size Fits All (I)

Wasted Human Cycles (I)

Performing Artefacts (II)

Plateaus and Platforms (II)

Displacement

Zero-Sum Game

Human API Assemblage (I)

24/7 Situated Bodies (II)

Automation Asymmetry (2021)

1

0 / 0

The premise of automation and a post-work future seems irresistible. While the automation discourse steers in the direction of technological inevitability and the replacement of human work, its underlying infrastructures expose a very different picture.

@ratherbright, "so a delivery robot caught fire..."

Sanela Jahić, "The Labour of Making Labour Disappear"

@mbrennanchina, "Click farm of 8,000 mobile phones..."

Automation's Narrative

Automation's Ideology

Definition

Fragmentation

Displacement

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Automation's Past

Common

Automation's Past

Common

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Automation's Constructs

Part I

Automation's Constructs

Part I

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Automation's Thought

Part I

Automation's Thought

Part I

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Within Automation’s ideology, the given interactions become ever more ambiguous and hard to grasp. Constructs of creator and user blur continuously and questions of the arrangement of usable actors within automation's structures need to be reasked. Part I looks at the reorganisation and displacement of actors within the instructions of automation and explores what it means to be automated.

Automation's Materiality

Part II

Automation's Materiality

Part II

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Automation's Spaces

Part II

Automation's Spaces

Part II

Part I

User Constructed/ing
Determining Ends
Universal, One Size Fits All
Wasted Human Cycles
Human API Assemblage

Common

The In Between
Tactile Exercises
Zero-Sum Game

Part II

Shiny Interfaces
Globalised Localities
Performing Artefacts
Plateaus and Platforms
24/7 Situated Bodies

Within Automation’s structures, the locality of this vast global ideology becomes continuously more apparent. While labour implications of automation span across locations, places and platforms, the localisation of concrete precarious and ephemeral code/spaces need to be examined. Part II explores the (post-)industrial infrastructures and the sociomateriality of workplaces and reveals underlying power relations within.

Automation's Past

Common

Andrew Norman Wilson, "The Art of Google Books"

Andrew Norman Wilson, "ScanOps"

Through these struggles and obvious flaws (which were never separate from the system in the first place), the false narrative and its violent ideology becomes more and more apparent. It is the sight of human beings, becoming visible in this vast anti-humanist system, which gives moments of clarity.

Ford Motor Co., "Ford and Taylor in the 1920s"

Ford Motor Co., "Ford and Taylor in the 1920s"

Hyper-fragmentation leading to hyper-exploitation only worked because of previous fragmentative groundwork.

Automation's Constructs

Part I

Turing Complete User

“Being a User is the last reminder that there is, whether visible or not, a computer, a programmed system you use.”(Lialina, 2012)

Ted Nelson, "Computer Lib"

General Purpose Hype

“There is nothing one user can do, that another can’t given enough time and respect. Computer Users are Turing Complete.”(Lialina, 2012)

“This psychic turn – that is, the turn to psychopolitics – also connects with the mode of operation of contemporary capitalism. Now, immaterial and non-physical forms of production are what determine the course of capitalism. What gets produced are not material objects, but immaterial ones – for instance, information and programs.”(Han, 2017)

Automation's Thought

Part I

From Computational Thinking to Human Computation

“To make sense of the world around us, it had to be translated, flattened. Now the world fits in our pocket. [...] Map projections inevitably produce distortions.”(Niquille, 2018)

Stefanie Olsen, "A slide from von Ahn"

Anti Captcha, "Our advanced quality control system"

Human API Assemblage

automation's constructs and thought

Edith Law and Luis von Ahn, "Human Computation"

Within this realm of human computation the whole automation discourse with all its ideologies and socio-political implications of programmable addressable humans is reduced to one single line of code.

Technology’s inherent instability and moments of breakdown lead to an assemblage of work, not only hidden behind the interface, but also in front of them. Humans encompass technology, which in return becomes a conversation. A conversation between human beings, where agency prevails. After all, we are “Turing Complete Users.”

Automation's Materiality

Part II

Apple Inc., "Slide to Unlock"

Apple Inc., "US8046721B2"

“Technology cannot be understood outside of its social practice, since the materiality of technology is shaped by practices and becomes part of these while simultaneously shaping the practices themselves.”
(Bjorn and Osterlund, 2015)

Sociomateriality

The shininess of technological artefacts, is not only a mere reflection reflecting its creator or design process, but it is a diffraction which emerges through the performance of its labour, reflecting its interference, revealing the different characteristics of the given socio-political entanglement.

Automation's Spaces

Part II

Permanent Transition

Immo Klink, "Gig Space"

Ghost workers become ghost spaces and ephemeral spaces become ephemeral workers. Just like the work within automation’s asymmetry, space is fragmented, off-shored, off sight and automatically generated.

Tim O'Reilly, "Web2MemeMap"

Architectures of Participation

24/7 Situated Bodies

automation's materiality and spaces

Simone C. Niquille, "Rendering of Jill, from Siemens Jack"

Automation’s ideology slips into every part of life. It is the collapse of space, the permanent transition, which is dictated by the platform. Every computational device extracts and modifies the surrounding human to serve the automation’s profit margin and future prognosis of it.

Rather than embracing the situated knowledge of the future user, the design process enforces an objective knowledge as standardisation. Through design, bodies are situated by computation. And with the emergence of delivery robots, housework robots, and highly advertised advanced robotics being remote controlled by workers, humans are situated through technology. All technologies are situated humans.

Hidden by Design